Dear Lucille,
The problems that still remain behind with my case are the following:1) The unauthorize or illegal deductions from the victim's bank account made in behalf of a victim help organization, like the Aids Fonds, for example. Check to see if victim is registered as a donor and when/why.2) The partial but not complete re-emergence of the victim himself but the suspicion that the victim is still not free or is playing for time. Some of these misgivings come from a dirth of information, discrepancies in information, etc. Could traces be put on the victim's phone calls to me by the police to check the victim's location? For the victim, although supposedly living close by and having a light work duty never seems to be at home and is always not in his/her home and cannot even come by yet to pick up Xmas gifts for the very first time in the victim's life.3) Indications that the victim is secretly the target of an organized group.This is indicated through names used in the media and through broad retro-active red-tape changes that put the victim at a more disadvantage position around the time of the victim's disappearance.4) The feeling that many agencies play a role in keeping a barrier up between the victim and those who are concerned about him/her and who help support him/her by encouraging the victim to assert his flimsy independence and to break off communication with the victim's relatives and supporters. Are there organizations that help promote better relationship between the victim and the victim's relatives through their philosphy or advice? Shouldn't notice be taken of the so-called "friends" of the victim, who always seem to be able to come into contact with the half-missing individual and to be regarded as popular, close advisors, who take over the tasks usually performed by parents but who can never influence the victim to accept or be grateful for the parents contribution to the victim's existence?5) During the worse part of our ordeal, which is still not truly over, we noticed that some institutions took a hard line against the victim's parents, although the parents state that they have reported the person missing to the police. These institutions seem to clam up and to impede answers to simple questions posed by the parents. Should not the possible interest of these institutions in the disappearance of the victim be taken into account?6) Evidence of heavy surveilance and bugging of our telephones, computers, mail etc., which impedes efforts to communicate with the victim. How can persons use facilities and devices, neutral ground so to speak, that are more reliable and surveilance free to aid in contacting the victim?